Miner v. Ecolab Inc. – Revenue Per Hour (RPH) Class Action Lawsuit
What is the latest update in the case?
Last updated: April 18, 2017 at 20:25 pm
The case was filed in March 2017. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
If you believe you qualify to be a class member or would like more information about this class action lawsuit, reach out to Strauss & Strauss, APC by calling (805) 303-8115 or contacting us online today.
What is the case about?
This is a proposed class action case. Plaintiff was employed by Ecolab, who paid the Plaintiff using its Revenue Per Hour (RPH) compensation structure. Plaintiff alleges, in part, that Ecolab failed to pay him overtime as required by California and Federal law, because the Revenue Per Hour compensation structure causes the payment of overtime wages at a rate that is below that required by California and Federal laws.
The Plaintiff seeks damages, penalties, and restitution, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.
Where is the case pending?
The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California as Case No. 2:17-cv-02313-FMO-JC. The case is assigned to the Honorable Fernando M. Olguin.
Who does this case involve?
This case involves anyone paid under the Revenue Per Hour compensation plan throughout the Country, including without limitation those Ecolab employees in California in its pest elimination and institutional divisions. The class period for California employees is March 24, 2013 to the present. The class period for non-California employees is either two or three years before March 24, 2017 through the present.
I think I am a class member. What should I do?
Please contact Strauss & Strauss directly for more information. Call us at (805) 303-8115.
Key Documents in the Case
Our Notable Class Action Cases
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.
-
Gonzalez v. Key Energy
-
Gutierrez v. Halliburton
-
Henson v. Seares Valley Mineral Operations, Inc.
-
Hiriarte v. Weatherford
-
Ayala v. Terminix International, Inc.
-
Bautista v. Alliance Environmental Group
What Makes Strauss & Strauss APC Different
-
If we don't get a favorable ruling the first time around, we work hard to appeal cases to ensure we do everything we can for your case.
-
We fight on behalf of employees only and are not afraid of going up against the largest corporations in the country, if not the world.
-
Our seasoned team of attorneys come up with innovative solutions unheard of in the past in order to advance their cases in court.
-
In the last decade, Strauss & Strauss APC has recovered over $100 million dollars for employees in California.