Pagel v. Dairy Farmers of America
Plaintiff Pagel filed a putative class action lawsuit against Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. for denial of meal periods to its non-exempt employees in California. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to provide him and his coworkers in California with
If you believe you qualify to be a class member or would like more information about this class action lawsuit, reach out to Strauss & Strauss, APC by calling (805) 303-8115 or contacting us online today.
What is the status of the case?
The case was filed on October 6, 2011 in California County Superior Court. Defendant filed its answer on November 29, 2011. The case is now “at issue,” and discovery (the formal exchange of information, questions and answers) is underway. The case has NOT been certified as a class action yet.
Who is affected by the case?
The suit seeks unpaid wages for all non-exempt employees of Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. that were employed in California at any point between October 6, 2007 to the present day. The unpaid wages are alleged to arise from, among other things, time spent dressing and undressing into required uniforms and for meal periods that were not provided.
What types of damages does Plaintiff seek?
Plaintiff seeks damages for unpaid wages for hours worked (possibly including overtime hours) from on or about October 6, 2007 through the present. These hours may relate to time spent by employees dressing/undressing into required uniforms. The damages also include wages for meal periods that were not provided. Plaintiff also seeks various penalties available under the California Labor Code. Those penalties include a penalty under Labor Code section 226 for inaccurate payroll statements.
What can I do to get involved with this case?
You may contact Plaintiff’s counsel using the contact form on this page. You may also call Strauss & Strauss, APC at (805) 641-6600. Finally, you can post questions about the case using the comment form below. All questions posted using the comment form will be reviewed by Strauss & Strauss, APC before being published.
Case Documents
Below are some of the important documents from this case.
Order Granting Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement
Our Notable Class Action Cases
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.
-
Gonzalez v. Key Energy
-
Gutierrez v. Halliburton
-
Henson v. Seares Valley Mineral Operations, Inc.
-
Hiriarte v. Weatherford
-
Ayala v. Terminix International, Inc.
-
Bautista v. Alliance Environmental Group
What Makes Strauss & Strauss APC Different
-
We Don't Give UpIf we don't get a favorable ruling the first time around, we work hard to appeal cases to ensure we do everything we can for your case.
-
We Exclusively Represent Employees
We fight on behalf of employees only and are not afraid of going up against the largest corporations in the country, if not the world.
-
We Think Outside of the Box
Our seasoned team of attorneys come up with innovative solutions unheard of in the past in order to advance their cases in court.
-
Over $100 Million RecoveredIn the last decade, Strauss & Strauss APC has recovered over $100 million dollars for employees in California.