Ventura Misclassification of Non-Exempt Employees Lawyers
Serving Ventura County and California
When California employers decide to cut costs by paying non-exempt employees a salary and calling them “exempt,” workers call on Strauss & Strauss, APC to recover unpaid overtime. So far, we have recovered millions of dollars for these misclassified-exempt employees.
Examples of recent misclassification cases we have taken include:
- Misclassified as exempt employee: Employer wrongfully paid dishwasher repair man as salaried-exempt and did not pay them overtime
- Misclassified as exempt employee: Employer wrongfully paid computer software technicians as salaried-exempt even though they did not earn enough per hour to make them exempt under California law
- Misclassified as exempt employee: Employer wrongfully paid office administrator as exempt in order to avoid having to pay overtime
- Misclassified as exempt employee: Employer wrongfully paid employee of dry cleaner as exempt from overtime, but she did not exercise discretion and independent judgment over 50% of the time
- Misclassified as independent contractor: Employer paid employee with 1099 even though he was not an independent contractor
- Misclassified as exempt employee: Large class action recovery against employer who classified pest control inspectors as exempt
Learn more about California wage and hour law in our frequently asked question (FAQ) section.
Non-Exempt Workers Misclassified as Exempt
California employers like to cut down on their payroll expenses in creative ways. One such way is to pay non-exempt employees as exempt; that is, they put a non-exempt worker on a salary and think that this should make them exempt from overtime, meal periods, double time, and more.
Glossary:
- “Exempt” means the employee doesn’t need to be paid overtime or double time.
- “Non-exempt” means the employee needs to be paid overtime and double time.
Putting a non-exempt worker on a salary does not make that employee exempt. A worker is exempt only if they fit into very narrowly defined categories.
Our Notable Class Action Cases
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.
-
Ayala v. Terminix International, Inc.
-
Bankwitz v. Ecolab Inc. - Territory Manager Overtime Lawsuit
-
Bautista v. Alliance Environmental Group
-
Berry v. DCOR, LLC
-
Bognuda v. Great White Dental
-
Campos v. Ecolab Inc. – California Route Sales Manager (RSM) Lawsuit
What Makes Strauss & Strauss APC Different
-
If we don't get a favorable ruling the first time around, we work hard to appeal cases to ensure we do everything we can for your case.
-
We fight on behalf of employees only and are not afraid of going up against the largest corporations in the country, if not the world.
-
Our seasoned team of attorneys come up with innovative solutions unheard of in the past in order to advance their cases in court.
-
In the last decade, Strauss & Strauss APC has recovered over $100 million dollars for employees in California.