Unreimbursed Business Expense Claim Lawyers in Ventura
Serving Ventura County and California
California law generally prohibits employers from requiring employees to buy uniforms or tools required for performing their jobs. However, there are some exceptions.
Employer Requires Uniforms but Doesn’t Pay for Them
The law: “When uniforms are required by the employer to be worn by the employee as a condition of employment, such uniforms shall be provided and maintained by the employer. The term ‘uniform’ includes wearing apparel and accessories of distinctive design or color.”
What this means: Most employees who have to wear a uniform (or clothing of a distinctive design) must be compensated for them. Plus, the employer has to pay for maintaining (i.e., washing) the uniform.
Exceptions: Nurses usually do not have to be reimbursed for uniform purchases. The same goes for persons who work in occupations that generally require people to wear white uniforms. But any uniform (regardless of color) which is required to be worn by an individual in an occupation that would not generally require that particular uniform, must be paid for by the employer.
Remedy: The employee can bring an action under California Labor Code section 2802 for the reimbursement of the illegal uniform purchases and/or the cost of laundering the uniforms.
If you want to know whether your employer needs to reimburse you for a uniform purchase, contact Strauss & Strauss, APC.
Employer Requires Tool Purchases but Doesn’t Pay for Them
The law: “When tools or equipment are required by the employer or are necessary to the performance of a job, such tools and equipment shall be provided and maintained by the employer, except that an employee whose wages are at least two times the minimum wage provided herein may be required to provide and maintain hand tools and equipment customarily required by the trade or craft. This subsection… shall not apply to apprentices regularly indentured under the State Division of Apprenticeship Standards.”
What this means: Most California employees who earn less than twice the applicable California minimum wage and who have to buy anything other than “hand tools” to do their job must be reimbursed for the tools.
Our Notable Class Action Cases
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.
-
Gonzalez v. Key Energy
-
Gutierrez v. Halliburton
-
Henson v. Seares Valley Mineral Operations, Inc.
-
Hiriarte v. Weatherford
-
Ayala v. Terminix International, Inc.
-
Bautista v. Alliance Environmental Group
What Makes Strauss & Strauss APC Different
-
If we don't get a favorable ruling the first time around, we work hard to appeal cases to ensure we do everything we can for your case.
-
We fight on behalf of employees only and are not afraid of going up against the largest corporations in the country, if not the world.
-
Our seasoned team of attorneys come up with innovative solutions unheard of in the past in order to advance their cases in court.
-
In the last decade, Strauss & Strauss APC has recovered over $100 million dollars for employees in California.